State v. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
Each side cites and relies upon several cases decided by both federal and state courts. The state relies in particular upon certain language in Leader Theatre Corp. v. Randforce Amusement Corp., 186 Misc. 280, 58 N. Y. Supp. (2d) 304, and Commonwealth v. McHugh, 326 Mass. 249, 93 N. E. (2d) 751. It further relies heavily on certain decisions of the United States supreme court in the Standard Oil Cases.
The defendants rely heavily upon the case of Paramount Publix Corp. v. Hill, 11 Fed. Supp. 478, particularly in view of the comment thereon in the case of Rithols v. Ammon, 240 Wis. 578, 4 N. W.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Leader Theatre Corp. v. Randforce Amusement Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
- Ritholz v. AmmonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Olstad v. Microsoft CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Milwaukee Braves, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Meyers v. Bayer AG, Bayer Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Emergency One, Inc. v. Waterous Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.