Legal Opinion
Emergency One, Inc. v. Waterous Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 20, 1998No. 97-C-692PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
This decision considers the scope of the Wisconsin antitrust statutes with respect to interstate trade and, in particular, the relevant effect of the 1980 amendments to Wis. Stat. Chapter 133, the state law regulating trusts and monopolies. Plaintiff Emergency One, Inc. (“E-One”), a Florida-based manufacturer of fire trucks, brings this action against defendants Waterous Company, Inc. (“Waterous”), Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. (“Pierce”) and Hale Products, Inc. (“Hale”), on twenty-two counts alleging violations of state and federal antitrust law, state…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- In re Target Corp. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Comes v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Olstad v. Microsoft CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.