Legal Opinion

Ritholz v. Ammon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The complaint alleges that plaintiffs are residents of the city of Chicago and copartners doing business under the, name of National, Optical Stores Company; that defendant, Ammon, is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting director of agriculture; that defendant, R. M. Orchard, is the duly qualified and acting assistant attorney general of Wisconsin; that the business of plaintiffs is the furnishing of optical service; that this service consists of grinding and processing lenses and the furnishing of frames, mountings, and lenses pursuant to prescriptions; that plaintiffs’ principal office…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Madison Airport Co. v. WrabetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Ritholz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. Allied Chemical & Dye CorpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Ritholz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Calvert Distillers Corp. v. GoldmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API