Ritholz v. Ammon
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
The complaint alleges that plaintiffs are residents of the city of Chicago and copartners doing business under the, name of National, Optical Stores Company; that defendant, Ammon, is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting director of agriculture; that defendant, R. M. Orchard, is the duly qualified and acting assistant attorney general of Wisconsin; that the business of plaintiffs is the furnishing of optical service; that this service consists of grinding and processing lenses and the furnishing of frames, mountings, and lenses pursuant to prescriptions; that plaintiffs’ principal office…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State ex rel. Madison Airport Co. v. WrabetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Ritholz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. Allied Chemical & Dye CorpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Ritholz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Calvert Distillers Corp. v. GoldmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.