State v. Milwaukee Braves, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
It seems crystal clear that under today’s structure of organized professional baseball, defendants and the members of the American League have complete power to control participation in major league baseball, and to control the number of teams and the location of their home games; that although the power is shared with the American League, defendants nevertheless have very substantial and effective power of control; that major league baseball, as now carried on, is a business in which large sums are invested, and substantial gains received by players and owners, and that many other business…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Flood v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Robertson v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- The State of Washington, Etc. v. The American League of Professional Baseball ClubsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- State v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.