Roberts v. State

OPINION

OSBORN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for murder. The jury assessed punishment at sixty years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

Point of Error No. One asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. The general standard of review for such contention is whether an analysis of the evidence in a light most favorable' to the verdict reflects that any rational trier of fact could have found each and every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Carlsen v. State, 654 S.W.2d 444 (Tex.Crim.App.1983). This being a circumstantial evidence case, the proper…