Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McAlester
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Stephens County; Prank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by J. A. MeAlester against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
In this opinion plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, and defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
Assuming the facts to be such as the evidence, together with the inferences reasonably deducible' therefrom, tends to establish in favor of the verdict, it appears: At about 2 o’clock at night, on August 20, 1909, at Maidow, Okla., plaintiff, after purchasing transportation ticket to Bridgeport, Tex., for his wife and four small children, the oldest six years of age and the other three SO' young as tO' require…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Doss v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. CoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co. v. CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Thompson v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- E. G. Fike & Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932