Legal Opinion

E. G. Fike & Co. v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1932No. 20613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.

This is a proceeding in error to review a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county, rendered on the 7th day of February, .1929, in favor of the defendant in error Adams, and against the plaintiff in error, for the recovery of damages in the sum of 8S90, oy rpiismi, as alleged, of water flooding the plaintiff’s land through a sewer that had been constructed by the plaintiff in error for the town of Red Fork.

There are two companion cases to this case, which is numbered in the court below as 391227, the petitions differing probably in name only and description of the land that was flooded.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Chickasha v. LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. King v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Town of Norman v. InceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. E. G. Fike & Co. v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. E. G. Fike & Co. v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. E. G. Fike Co. v. LatimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API