Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Horseshoe Club Operating Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1996No. 26631PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Juanita Hudson worked as a waitress for respondent Horseshoe Club Operating Company (Horseshoe). Horseshoe accepted an industrial injury claim by Hudson in January 1992. The next month, Horseshoe terminated her employment and then her temporary total disability benefits because Hudson was working at another job in violation of the collective bargaining agreement between her union and Horseshoe. Hudson appealed the denial of benefits, and she and Horseshoe settled the appeal, with Horseshoe agreeing to pay the benefits.
In July 1993, Hudson’s doctor released her to light duty…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- PDM Molding, Inc. v. StanbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- State Industrial Insurance System v. United Exposition Services Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Marsolek v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Titanium Metals Corp. of America v. Clark County District Board of Health Air Pollution Control Hearing BoardNevada Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Nevada Yellow Cab Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Dickinson v. American Medical ResponseNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- State Industrial Insurance System v. EngelNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. WashingtonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Nevada Yellow Cab Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.