Dickinson v. American Medical Response
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this appeal, we address the use of equitable estoppel and waiver principles in administrative workers’ compensation proceedings, as well as the appeals officer’s duty to make factual findings in rendering a determination. We conclude that equitable estoppel and waiver principles may be applied in workers’ compensation proceedings, and therefore, since those principles generally require a factual determination, the appeals officer has authority to and must consider them in the first instance. Further, we reiterate that, in resolving aspects of a contested case, including equitable…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Edwards v. Emperor's Garden RestaurantNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Valley Bank of Nevada v. GinsburgNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Lentz v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Construction Industry Workers' Compensation Group Ex Rel. Mojave Electric v. ChalueNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Weaver v. State, Department of Motor VehiclesNevada Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Elizondo v. Hood Machine, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Howell v. RicciNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Am. Expressway Inc. Vs. Sierra Nev. Adm'Rs, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
- American Expressway Inc. Vs. AbateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Gilman v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.