Legal Opinion
Stern v. Dill
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 21, 1989No. C3-88-1113PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s dental malpractice suit for failure to file timely an affidavit identifying expert witnesses as required by Minn.Stat. § 145.682, subds. 2(2) and 4 (1988). The court of appeals reversed, Stern v. Dill, 430 N.W.2d 864 (Minn.App.1988). We affirm.
Sherry Stern, plaintiff-respondent, commenced this malpractice action against defendant-appellant Dr. Donald Dill on August 20, 1987. Her summons and complaint were accompanied by an affidavit stating that expert review could not then be obtained because Dr. Dill had not yet released all of her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Gerald Alger and Frelove Alger v. Larry HayesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Mindy Taragan v. Eli Lilly and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Strauch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Williams v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Jill Nesladek, as Trustee for Heirs and Next of Kin of Jeremy J. Nesladek, Decedent v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Anderson v. RengacharySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.