Legal Opinion

Duroderigo v. Culwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 19, 1915No. 5406PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Love County; Stillwell H. Rmsell, Judge. Action by Columbus Duroderigo, by his guardian, Frank O’Savior, against W. A.' Culwell. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRETT, C.

This is a suit in ejectment brought by Frank O’Savior as guardian of Columbus Duroderigo, an incompetent, against W. A. Culwell for possession of certain real estate described in the petition, and for damages for unlawfully withholding possession, and for the rents and profits for six years prior to the filing of this suit. Culwell answered by general denial, and denied specifically that Columbus Duroderigo .was an incompetent. A trial was had to the court and jury, which found for defendant, Culwell. Judgment was rendered in his favor, and plaintiff appeals to this court.

Th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Adams Oil & Gas Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. McCabe & Steen Construction Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Consolidated Motor Sales Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Norris v. DagleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. LaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Edwards v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. McKone Et Ux. v. McConkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API