McKone Et Ux. v. McConkey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Actions by Robert S. McConkey against Roger McKone and wife, and by Leopold Knebel against Roger McKone and wife. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error. Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; James B. Cullison, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.
Robert S. McConkey, as plaintiff, instituted an action in the district court of Kingfisher county against Roger Mc-Kone and Isabella A. McKone, his wife, to recover judgment on a promissory note for $3,000 and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given on lands of the defendants at the same time as security for the note. The note and mortgage were executed to Belle H. King and assigned to the plaintiff before the institution of the suit. Thereafter Leopold Knebel, as plaintiff, instituted an action against the same defendants to foreclose a real estate mortgage given to secure two promissory…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Duroderigo v. CulwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. DeasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- In re the Estate of KeelingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- Lakey v. North McAlester Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- City of Yale v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Mothersead v. WileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.