Legal Opinion

Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the-Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

On April 9, 1886, the city of' Chicago filed a petition in the Superior Court of Cook county to condemn certain property therein described, for the purpose of opening and extending South Canal street from Lumber street to Archer avenue, in pursuance of an ordinance passed by the council of said city March 15, 1886. The property was- condemned, and a judgment for $178,271.98 was entered. A supplemental petition was filed in said court February 9, 1887, asking for an assessment on the property benefited, to raise the money necessary to pay the ■compensation awarded by the condemnation judgment.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bradford v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Hutt v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Goodwillie v. City of Lake ViewIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Guild v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Stanton v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. OsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. City of Chicago v. WilloughbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Madawick Contracting Co. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API