Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Willoughby

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Merritt W. Pinckney, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Appellants are the owners of or interested in property against which a special assessment for local improvements has been confirmed by the judgment of the circuit court of Cook county. To reverse that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The property in controversy is situated on South Park avenue between Fifty-fifth and Fifty-sixth streets. South Park avenue originally was sixty-six feet wide except between those two- streets, where it was only twenty-nine feet wide. It ivas proposed by the city to widen South Park avenue between the streets mentioned, by the condemnation of thirty-seven feet…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hutt v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Guild v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. City of Chicago v. MecartneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Allen v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Koon v. NicholsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. ThomassonIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Village of Beverly v. SchaerrIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. City of Chicago v. MegartneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Mecartney v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API