Legal Opinion

Smith v. Flack

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1884No. 10,738PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Superior Court of Marion County.

1Opinion of the Court

Colerick, C.

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellants to recover the value of certain brick furnished to.the appellant Smith, and used by him in paving certain sidewalks in the city of Indianapolis, under a contract with the city. The action Was tried by the court, and resulted in a judgment against the appellants for 1159.13.

The only ertors assigned, that have been discussed by the appellants, are:

1. That the court erred in overruling the separate demurrer of the appellant Hammons to the complaint.

2. That the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the second paragraph…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Davis v. CallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Board of Commissioners v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Philbrooks v. McEwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Crawford v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Pitzer v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fleming v. HartrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bement v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Smith & Stoughton Corp. v. ByersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Hotmire v. O'BrienIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Smith v. LottonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API