Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Crockett
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 31 opinions
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.
Action by the appellants, against the appellees, Crockett and Woodling. The complaint was as follows:
“For amended complaint herein, the plaintiffs say that they are a firm, doing a general lumber business in the city of Logansport, Indiana, under the firm name and *222Qstyle of Crawford &Co.; that on or about the 16th day of April, 1869, they sold and delivered to one Jefferson Woodling a large lot of lumber, the particulars of which are set forth in ‘ Exhibit A,’ filed herewith and made a part of this complaint; that [there] remains due and unpaid, for said lumber, the sum of two hundred and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colter v. FreseIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Hill v. BradenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- City of Crawfordsville v. BarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Heddens v. YoungloveIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Raber v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by31 opinions
- Potter Manufacturing Co. v. A. B. Meyer & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Nash Engineering Co. v. Marcy Realty Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1944
- Lawton v. CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- McCorry v. G. Cowser Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Lee & Mayfield, Inc. v. Lykowski House Moving Engineers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.