Legal Opinion

Pitzer v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8388PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

— On the 18th day of January, 1879, appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, and thirty days granted in which to file a bill of exceptions. Two bills were filed by him, one on the 25th day of January and one on the 15th day of February.

The first bill of exceptions shows that the appellee asked the court to instruct the jury to answer interrogatories submitted by it in case they found a general verdict for the plaintiff, and that the appellant requested the court to instruct the jury to answer the interrogatories, whether their general verdict was for the plaintiff or for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Sohn v. Marion & Liberty Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Harrison v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Alcorn v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Backus v. GallentineIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. FixIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Calvert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Rans v. the Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Bowlus v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API