United States v. Lumagui
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
RIVES, Judge:
In accordance with his pleas, Sergeant Lumagui was convicted by a special court-martial of one specification of violating a lawful general regulation. Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892. The convening authority approved the sentence adjudged by officer and enlisted court members: a bad conduct discharge, confinement for three months, a fine of $2,000 and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. On appeal, Lumagui contends that his conviction cannot stand because the charged portion of the regulation is fatally overbroad. We disagree and affirm his conviction.
I
We first…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. FoyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. HiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. MartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WebsterU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. ArthenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BoyettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. TownsendU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1994