United States v. Boyett
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
DIXON, Chief Judge,
joined by Senior Judges O’HAIR, LEONARD, and McLAUTHLIN (concurring in part and dissenting in part):
I concur in the majority disposition of this case except for the affirmance of specification 5 of the Charge. In my view, the trial judge erred by denying the defense motion to dismiss this specification as a matter of law. I believe existing legal precedent requires this Court to find appellant’s plea of guilty to specification 5 improvident.16 I would dismiss specification 5 and affirm the sentence as adjudged.17
Given the statutory mandate of Article 66, UCMJ, this Court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. JohannsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. WalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. AppelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. ParrilloU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. ArthenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.