Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Townsend

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided February 23, 1994No. CGCM 0048; Docket No. 981Published

1ConcurrenceFearnow, Judge

I concur in the result reached by the majority. However, my decision is based on appellant’s failure to raise at trial the issue now before us.

At the time the Military Judge took judicial notice that Article 8-H of the Coast Guard Personnel Manual, Commandant Instruction M1000.6, was a lawful general order, the appellant was afforded “an opportunity to be heard as to the propriety of taking judicial notice.” MRE 201(e). Having failed to challenge the lawfulness of the order immediately after the Military Judge announced his intention to take judicial notice, the appellant waived the right to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. WebsterU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. HawkinsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. LumaguiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. ThompsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API