Ingham v. Harrison
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood
This rather complicated dispute between various parties regarding a builder’s lien note and contract comes to us only on the subordinate issues of attorney’s fees, interest and court costs allowable against the note makers and property owners, Mesdames Ingham and Chaney, who are the petitioners here. They originally sued the contractor and payee of the note, Van Smith, in damages for failure to complete the dwelling in question according to the contract. Soon thereafter, Smith’s assignee, B. S. Harrison, who is respondent here, sued them and sundry alleged material lien claimants seeking: (a)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kinzbach Tool Co. v. Corbett-Wallace Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
- Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Laning v. Iron City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Findlay v. CaveTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Wayne v. A.V.A. Vending, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Tuthill v. Southwestern Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. Small Business Investment Co. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Kleiner v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.