Legal Opinion

Findlay v. Cave

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1981No. B-9446PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

The question before us in this cause concerns attorney’s fees under Texas Revised Civil Statutes article 2226. The trial court rendered judgment on a jury verdict for respondent Cave and awarded him attorney’s fees necessary in prosecuting that action. The court of civil appeals upheld the reasonableness of the attorney’s fee award. 597 S.W.2d 37. The question presented to this Court is whether the original demand for payment upon petitioner Findlay was excessive as a matter of law, thus discharging any liability for fees expended in litigation thereafter. We hold…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. Small Business Investment Co. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Ingham v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Collingsworth v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Findlay v. CaveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. Okon v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Oyster Creek Financial Corp. v. Richwood Investments II, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  4. McMillin v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. City of Houston v. First City, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API