Legal Opinion

Wayne v. A.V.A. Vending, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 12, 2001No. 13-00-057-CVPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RODRIGUEZ, Justice.

This is a suit to enforce a commercial real estate lease. A jury awarded James Wayne, appellant, $4,265.00 in actual damages for breach of contract. By three points of error, appellant contends the excessive demand doctrine does not apply to contractual attorney’s fees, thus, the court improperly barred attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest by applying that doctrine. Appellee, A.V.A. Vending, brings one cross-point complaining the court erred in granting appellant’s motion for Judgment Non Obstante Verdicto (JNOV) on the grounds of laches. Appellee also brings a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Leitch v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  2. Sauceda v. Kerlin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  3. Fairmont Supply Co. v. Hooks Industrial, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. Hesseltine v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
  5. Mohican Oil & Gas, LLC. v. Scorpion Exploration & Prodction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API