Legal Opinion

Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Coclin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 26, 1931No. 13188PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase.

The defendant purchased from the plaintiff a soda fountain outfit; there was a written contract between the parties; plaintiff accepted on the purchase price of the new fountain an old fountain owned by the defendant; and the purchase price was evidenced by notes of the defendant to plaintiff, the payment of which was secured by chattel mortgage over the soda fountain purchased. Defendant claimed the new fountain was not what it was represented to be by the plaintiff when the purchase was made, that it did not give…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Hampton & Branchville R. & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Walker v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Kirven v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  4. Black v. B. B. Kirkland Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. LawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baeza v. Robert E. Lee Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Cannon v. PULLIAM MOTOR CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Turner v. CareySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Hobart Manufacturing Co. v. RodziewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Apple v. EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API