Legal Opinion

Baeza v. Robert E. Lee Chrysler, Plymouth, Dodge, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 28, 1983No. 0006PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action in tort for damages. The plaintiff, Victor J. Baeza, sued for fraud in the sale of a used truck. The defendants denied any fraud and defendant International Investments Incorporated, the assignee of the installment sales contract, counterclaimed for the unpaid balance of the purchase price. At the close of the evidence the trial judge granted directed verdicts for all defendants on Baeza’s cause of action and for defendant International on the counterclaim. Baeza appealed. We affirm as to the counterclaim and reverse and remand for a new trial on the action for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McMahan v. McMahonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Gilbert v. Mid-South MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Turner v. CareySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Ebner v. Haverty Furniture Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Lawson v. Citizens & Southern National Bank ex rel. Will of ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Harper v. EthridgeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. May v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Starkey v. BellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Fields v. Yarborough Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API