Legal Opinion

Kirven v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 5, 1907No. 6616PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Action by J. P. Kirven against Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Argument overlooked at proper time, but printed as an appendix. cites: On question of res judicata: 17 S. C., 42; 94 S. C., 351; 19 S. C., 150, 254; 44 S. C., 1; 49 S. C., 505; 1 Van Fleet on Former Adj., secs. 168, 171, 172; Black on Judg., 768; L. R. 6 Q. B., 687; 33 S. E. R., 292; 33 N. E. R., 491; 10 Gray, 231; 104 Mass., 326; 38 N. E. R„ 976; 19 Ency.

Read the full summary

Action by J. P. Kirven against Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Argument overlooked at proper time, but printed as an appendix. cites: On question of res judicata: 17 S. C., 42; 94 S. C., 351; 19 S. C., 150, 254; 44 S. C., 1; 49 S. C., 505; 1 Van Fleet on Former Adj., secs. 168, 171, 172; Black on Judg., 768; L. R. 6 Q. B., 687; 33 S. E. R., 292; 33 N. E. R., 491; 10 Gray, 231; 104 Mass., 326; 38 N. E. R„ 976; 19 Ency. P. & P., 731, 733; 24 Ency., 785. cite: On question of res 'judicata: 17 S. C., 40; 94 U. S., 351; 52 S. C., 173; 1 Rich. L., 474;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action for damages, alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff as the result of using certain fertilizers in the cultivation of his crops, manufactured and sold to him by the defendant.

As the main question herein is whether the issues raised by the pleadings had already been adjudicated in an action between the same parties, in the Circuit Court of the United States, it will be necessary to state briefly the proceeding's in the two cases.

On the 15th of November, 1898, the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co., as plaintiff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Gunter v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Hancock National Bank v. FarnumSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Germofert Mfg. Co. v. CastlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Crestwood Golf Club, Inc. v. PotterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Liquid Carbonic Co. v. CoclinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Mitchell v. Federal Intermediate Credit BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API