Legal Opinion

Walker v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 15, 1930No. 12950PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice BeEase.

The complaint of the respondent alleged, and the appellant admitted the allegations, that on July 21, 1928, the respondent insured his Chrysler coach automobile with the appellant, and, in the contract of indemnity, the appellant “agreed to defend in behalf of the insured any claim or suit against the assured, even if groundless, brought on account of bodily injury or property damage covered by this policy and agreed by their policy or contract to pay any judgment recovered against this plaintiff up to the sum of Five Thousand…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Davis' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  2. Edgefield Mfg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Pickett v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Anderson v. Hampton & Branchville R. & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Whaley v. Guardian Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Peters v. Great American Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Pennsylvania Threshermen and Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Emily S. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  3. Pharr v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  4. Cook v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Andrews v. Central Surety Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API