Legal Opinion
Black v. B. B. Kirkland Seed Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 1, 1930No. 12981PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Blease.
Action by the respondent against the appellant for the recovery of damages, alleged to have been sustained in connection with the purchase of rye for planting purposes.
Paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the complaint are as follows:
“3. That on or about November 1, 1928, and again on or about November 17, 1928, the plaintiff applied to the defendant for the purchase from defendant of genuine abruzzi rye to be sown by him; and at said times the defendant sold and delivered to the plaintiff what it represented as genuine abruzzi rye, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hodges v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Mull v. TouchberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
- Jumper v. Dorchester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Ruff v. Columbia &c. RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
- Rainey v. SimonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Stevenson v. B. B. Kirkland Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. CoclinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Durant v. Palmetto Chevrolet Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Scott v. McIntoshSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.