Lishinski v. City of Duluth
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge
Appellant City of Duluth challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment based on statutory recreational immunity, arguing that the court erred in concluding that whether an artificial and allegedly dangerous condition was “hidden,” such that appellants would have a duty to warn, involved a genuine issue of material fact. Because we agree that there is a genuine issue of material fact, we affirm denial of summary judgment.
FACTS
Respondents Janet A. Lishinski and Gary H. Lishinski, individually and as trustees for the heirs and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Steinke v. City of AndoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Johnson v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miskovich v. Independent School District 318District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008