Legal Opinion

Lishinski v. City of Duluth

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 2001No. CX-01-747PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

Appellant City of Duluth challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment based on statutory recreational immunity, arguing that the court erred in concluding that whether an artificial and allegedly dangerous condition was “hidden,” such that appellants would have a duty to warn, involved a genuine issue of material fact. Because we agree that there is a genuine issue of material fact, we affirm denial of summary judgment.

FACTS

Respondents Janet A. Lishinski and Gary H. Lishinski, individually and as trustees for the heirs and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Steinke v. City of AndoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Johnson v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miskovich v. Independent School District 318District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
  2. Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API