Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1989No. 02863PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Appellant, Richard Johnson, was convicted by a jury of rape, indecent assault and corrupting the morals of a minor in connection with an incident in which he forced the ten-year old complainant to engage in sexual intercourse. He was sentenced to the mandatory five to ten year term of *187incarceration for rape.1 No sentence was imposed on the remaining offenses. Johnson now appeals the judgment of sentence and argues he should have been permitted to introduce evidence of a prior nonconsensual sexual assault against the victim. This evidence was disallowed by the trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. CargoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. BoylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. NievesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. BerkowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. K.S.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API