Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1994No. 149 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice: *

The question presented to the Court is whether the Rape Shield Law 1 bars admission of evidence that a rape victim had previously been a victim in another nonconsensual sexual assault. Although we find that the Rape Shield law does not prohibit the admission of evidence regarding a prior sexual assault suffered by the victim, we further find, for the reasons that follow, that the evidence in this case was inadmissible on other grounds.

The testimony in the instant case revealed the following essential facts. The victim, Nicole S., was ten years of age at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. LivelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Commonwealth v. FoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiStefanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. GuilfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API