Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Berkowitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1992No. 1602PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant appeals from judgment of sentence imposed following convictions of rape and indecent assault. We are called upon to determine the degree of physical force necessary to complete the act of rape in Pennsylvania. We find that under the totality of the circumstances, evidence of sufficient force was not adduced herein. We are also asked to decide whether the trial court improperly excluded evidence of the victim’s motive to fabricate the charge of indecent assault. We find that it did. Accordingly, we discharge appellant on the rape conviction and reverse and remand for a new…

3Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. NicelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. TothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. GladdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. GerulisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. In the Interest of D.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API