Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Dukraft Manufacturing Co. & Bear Mill Manufacturing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames B. M. McNally, J.

In an arbitration proceeding petitioner moves to vacate the award on the grounds set forth in section 1462 of the Civil Practice Act. Respondent cross-moves for an order confirming the award. The award is dated January 12, 1956. The hearing was had on January 12, 1956, *1058before a panel of three arbitrators. The award was executed by two of the arbitrators. The third arbitrator, who did not join in the award, by affidavit verified February 10, 1956 alleges that his associates disregarded the evidence adduced at the hearing on January 12, 1956 and instead predicated the award on ex parte matters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Textile Corp. & Sheila-Lynn, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. E. Gerli & Co. v. Oscar Heineman Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. In re the Arbitration between Shirley Silk Co. & American Silk Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Matter of Horowitz v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Milliken Woolens, Inc. & Weber Knit Sportswear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. In re the Arbitration between Brill & Muller Brothers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API