Legal Opinion

Matter of Horowitz v. Kaplan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the authority of Flannery v. Sahagian (134 N. Y. 85) and Hinkle v. Zimmerman (184 N. Y. 114).

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flannery v. . SahagianNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Hinkle v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fred J. Brotherton, Inc. v. KreielsheimerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. In re the Arbitration between Brill & Muller Brothers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In re the Arbitration between Dukraft Manufacturing Co. & Bear Mill Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In re the Arbitration between Petroleum Cargo Carriers, Ltd. & Unitas, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Jelenevsky v. LeonakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API