Legal Opinion

E. Gerli & Co. v. Oscar Heineman Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

A large quantity of raw silk was sold by Oscar Heineman Corporation to E. Gerli & Co., Inc., which disposed of some of it to customers. Many of them rejected it for the reason, as they believed, that its quality did not conform with the required standard. A con troversy concerning it arose between Heineman and Gerli which was submitted to arbitration and resulted in a unanimous award by the three arbitrators in favor of Gerli. This award, holding that the quality was not equal to the standard exacted by the contract, is based upon tests submitted by the buyer, upon official tests made by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Goldfinger v. LiskerNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Korein v. RabinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Seaboard Surety Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. In re the Arbitration between Rosenberg & WolfeNew York Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API