Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Brill & Muller Brothers, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The petitioner moves for vacatur of an arbitration award upon the grounds (1) that it was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means and (2) that there was evident partiality in the arbitrator. The usual prayer for other relief is included in the notice.
The petitioner had stored certain furniture, furnishings and clothing with the respondent, a storage warehouse concern in New York City. She thereupon left the city, allegedly giving the respondent the address of a friend as the place to which her mail was to be sent. Upon returning to the city several months later, the petitioner…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ballantine Books Inc. v. Capital Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- People v. . RodawaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Stefano Berizzi Co. v. KrauszNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Landau v. StracquadaineNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Caso v. CoffeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976