Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Shirley Silk Co. & American Silk Mills, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 22, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
We think that Granowitz, the arbitrator designated by petitioner-respondent, should have revealed to appellant that fourteen months before the arbitration herein the firm of which he is now and was then president, in another arbitration
*573proceeding, had received an award of over $31,000 from a board of arbitrators of which the president of the petitioner-respondent was one. The failure to disclose this fact requires that this award be set aside. (See Matter of Knickerbocker T. Corp. v. Sheila-Lynn, Inc., 172 Misc. 1015; affd., 259 App. Div. 992.) The parties must proceed to a new arbitration…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Textile Corp. & Sheila-Lynn, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Textile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Lipschutz & GutwirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- In re the Arbitration between Milliken Woolens, Inc. & Weber Knit Sportswear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- In re the Arbitration between Colony Liquor Distributors, Inc. & Local 669, International Brotherhood of TeamstersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- In re the Arbitration between Dukraft Manufacturing Co. & Bear Mill Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- In re the Arbitration between Petroleum Cargo Carriers, Ltd. & Unitas, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.