In re the Claim of Snapperman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective July 2, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant, employed as an assistant buyer, elected to retire early allegedly due to harassment by her supervisor. She was not required to retire when she did and, although she claimed the harassment caused her to have hypertension, she produced no medical evidence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of WilenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In re the Claim of SocolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Claim of KrokosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Claim of GaiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of LaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of EhrenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.