Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Socol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying her benefits on the grounds that she voluntarily left employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 1). Claimant, a secretary, presumably because of a long standing personality clash with her superior, gave her employer notice on December 5, 1966 of her intention to leave employment on December 31. OmDeeember 9 a dispute occurred between claimant and her superior which resulted in claimant’s leaving work early. The employer testified that she was not fired but told to return to work on Monday,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of MalaspinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. In re the Claim of MalaspinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SnappermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. In re SenatorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API