Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Krokos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 10, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

We reject claimant’s contention that the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board erred in determining that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Although claimant contended that his resignation was prompted by harassment and that he expected to be fired anyway, the alleged harassment consisted of supervisory criticism concerning his job…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re the Claim of SnappermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. In re the Claim of MastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim for Unemployment Insurance of Weidner v. Life Care Centers of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In re the Claim of Crandall-MarsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of LaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re the Claim of EhrenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re the Claim of FrankinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API