Legal Opinion

United States v. Papia

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 24, 1975No. 75-CR-84PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

The defendants in this criminal action, Sally A. Papia, James R. Jennaro, Russell J. Enea, Maxamillion J. Adonnis, Joseph Y. Basile, and Herbert H. Holland, are charged with conspiring to use extortionate means to collect and attempt to collect an extension of credit to certain persons and to punish those persons for nonrepayment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 891(7) and 894. Defendants Papia and Jennaro have further been charged with obstructing commerce by extortionate means, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, The Hobbs Act, and with the collection of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. FinnDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  2. Sanchez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sanchez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. United States v. StoneDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
  5. United States v. LeoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API