Legal Opinion

United States v. Finn

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1995No. Crim. 5-95-12(01) to 5-95-12(03)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

I.Introduction

This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), upon the following pretrial Motions of the Defendants: 1

1. The Motion of the Defendants Harold “Skip” Finn (“Finn”) and Daniel Brown (“Brown”) that the government agents retain their rough notes; 2

2. The Motion of Finn and Brown to compel the production of Sentencing Guidelines information;

3. The Motion of Finn and Brown…

2Cases cited166 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Samy A. Mankarious and Thomas K. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. AdkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. BootsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Alfred PembertonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. BeckfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API