Legal Opinion

United States v. Leo

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 12, 1976No. 75-CR-132PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

This case is before the Court for resolution of numerous pretrial motions brought by the defendants. The grand jury has returned a seven-count indictment in this action charging defendants, in general, with violating and conspiring to violate The Controlled Substance Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., violating the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3), by traveling in interstate commerce to carry on unlawful activity, and with carrying firearms unlawfully during the commission of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(2). Not each defendant is named in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  3. State v. HirschCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. United States v. NelsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  5. United States v. White Ready-Mix Concrete Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API