Pee Dee Electric Membership Corp. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The basic contentions of the respective parties may be stated as follows:
Pee Dee contends: (1) The provisions of Article 8 of the contract of January 5, 1956, are applicable to Knob Hill. (2) In accordance therewith, it is entitled to enjoin the Power Company from serving residences within three hundred feet of the distribution lines constructed by Pee Dee prior to January 9, 1957. (3) It is entitled to serve all residences within three hundred feet of its said lines notwithstanding the annexation of Knob Hill by Rockingham and the refusal of Rockingham to grant it permission (franchise) to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Town of Grimesland v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Municipal CorporationsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- City of Moultrie v. Colquitt County Rural Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. Upshur Rural Electric Co-Operative Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
- Farmers Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Carteret-Craven Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Tri-County Electric Ass'n v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Domestic Electric Service, Inc. v. City of Rocky MountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Missouri Public Service Co. v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Unity Light & Power Co. v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.