Legal Opinion

Tri-County Electric Ass'n v. City of Gillette

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1978No. 4880PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant public utility (hereafter Tri-County), selling electricity, claimed in its declaratory judgment action filed in the district court that defendant-ap-pellee City (hereafter Gillette), a municipality authorized to sell electricity to its inhabitants, was invading its territory. The district court found that Gillette had the “exclusive right to serve electrical customers *998within the City of Gillette and to grant franchises within its boundaries.” The trial court further found that Gillette “may take over Plainitiffs [sic] facilities only upon paying just…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Appeal of Pine Bluffs v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1958

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Albany County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Meuse-Rhine-Ijssel Cattle Breeders of Canada Ltd. v. Y-Tex Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Citizens for Preservation of Waterman Lake v. DavisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API