Tri-County Electric Ass'n v. City of Gillette
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RAPER, Justice.
The plaintiff-appellant public utility (hereafter Tri-County), selling electricity, claimed in its declaratory judgment action filed in the district court that defendant-ap-pellee City (hereafter Gillette), a municipality authorized to sell electricity to its inhabitants, was invading its territory. The district court found that Gillette had the “exclusive right to serve electrical customers *998within the City of Gillette and to grant franchises within its boundaries.” The trial court further found that Gillette “may take over Plainitiffs [sic] facilities only upon paying just…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Appeal of Pine Bluffs v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Albany County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Meuse-Rhine-Ijssel Cattle Breeders of Canada Ltd. v. Y-Tex Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Citizens for Preservation of Waterman Lake v. DavisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.