Legal Opinion
Profit v. City of Tulsa
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 21, 1980No. M-79-136, M-79-135, M-79-134, and M-79-45PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Presiding Judge:
The appellants were convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa for the Offense of Loitering for the Purpose of Prostitution in Case Nos. 257530, 258125, 258126 and 257832. Punishment ranged from thirty (30) to sixty (60) days.
Some of the acts forming the basis for the appellants’ convictions were: (1) Standing in the doorway of a house and yelling at the male occupant in an automobile; (2) Holding the front door of a house open and waiving to occupants of cars to come in; and (3) Calling out to a male passerby. Because the issues raised on appeal in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Hayes v. Municipal Court of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- City of Detroit v. BowdenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Brown v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Johnson v. CarsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1983
- Christian v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.