Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brown v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1978No. 2961, 2936, 2989 and 2863PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice, and RABINOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, Justices. CONNOR, Justice.

This consolidated appeal arises from four criminal cases based on Anchorage Municipal Ordinance 8.14.110 which prohibits loitering for the purpose of solicitation of prostitution. This ordinance, which we will refer to as AO 8.14.110, provides as follows:

“No person will loiter in or near a thoroughfare or place open to the public in a manner and under circumstances manifesting the purpose of, inducing, enticing, soliciting or procuring another to participate in an act of prostitution.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Hattie Mae Ricks v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Silvar v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wyche v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Coleman v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API