S. L. W. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, Justice.
The question presented is whether an illegitimate posthumous child can recover workmen’s compensation death benefits. What makes the case unusual is that the father had no actual knowledge of the pregnancy. He was killed before being informed.
The deceased, a 29-year-old ironworker, was killed on March 28, 1967, while working on a construction project on the Nen-ana River. On August 10, 1967, a woman 19 years of age gave birth to a male child. She named him S.L.W. after the deceased. A claim for death benefits was filed on behalf of the child about 18 months later. The reason…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Doughty ex rel. Woods v. EnglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- LaBlue v. SpeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Howarth v. PfeiferAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- King v. Peninsular Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Green v. BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Stringer v. DudoichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Allred v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Fox v. Alascom, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Wade v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.