Legal Opinion
Howarth v. Pfeifer
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1968No. 890PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before NESBETT, C. J., and DIMOND and RABINO WITZ, JJ. DIMOND, Justice.
Following a fire which destroyed certain property in Spenard, Alaska in 1961, appellant sought damages in this action resulting from an alleged breach of an oral contract for fire insurance and from an alleged negligent misrepresentation that fire insurance had been obtained with respect to such property. The trial court found that there was insufficient evidence of an oral contract for fire insurance for that issue to go to the jury, and directed a verdict in appellee’s favor as to such issue. The issue regarding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.