Legal Opinion

King v. Peninsular Portland Cement Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1921No. Docket No. 55PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Marie King and others presented their claim for compensation against the Peninsular Portland Cement Company for the accidental death of plaintiffs’ decedent in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation defendant and the Michigan Mutual Liability Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The writ of- certiorari herein brings before this court from the industrial accident board the record in the claim for compensation of Marie King, Margaret Aughinbaugh and Joseph Aughinbaugh, against the defendants, as total dependents of Burley Aughinbaugh who was killed May 19, 1920, while employed by the defendant Peninsular Portland Cement Company at Cement City, Michigan. Marie King was the wife of deceased. The other two applicants claim compensation as his children, by Marie King. The only question in controversy is the dependency of the above named applicants, or that of any of them.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Egbert v. GreenwaltMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. People v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Rabeke v. BaerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Evans v. State ex rel. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Serafin v. SerafinMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. LaBlue v. SpeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rehberg v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MELVINDALE, ECORSE SCH. DIST. NO. 11Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Maxwell v. MaxwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Yanoff v. YanoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API